OOTIKOF / KATZENJAMMER


The OOTIKOF, an internationally renowned society of flamers since 1998, invites you to join in the fun.
Clicking on Casual Banter will get you to all the sections.
 
HomeHome  PortalPortal  Latest imagesLatest images  RegisterRegister  Log in  

 

 The New York Times "breaking "from convention"

Go down 
3 posters
AuthorMessage
The Wise And Powerful
Admin
Admin
The Wise And Powerful


Posts : 111040
Join date : 2014-07-29
Age : 101
Location : A Mile High

The New York Times "breaking "from convention" Empty
PostSubject: The New York Times "breaking "from convention"   The New York Times "breaking "from convention" EmptyMon Jan 20, 2020 5:09 am

Published 6 hours ago
New York Times editorial board endorses Warren, Klobuchar for president
By Edmund DeMarche | Fox News


The New York Times announced late Sunday that its editorial board was breaking "from convention" and will endorse two candidates for president in 2020: Minnesota Sen. Amy Klobuchar and Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren.

The paper’s endorsement has traditionally been one of the most coveted for a Democratic politician. The editorial board wrote that in choosing these two candidates, it recognizes that both "radical" and "realist" models should be considered.

The paper said it spent more than 12 hours with the candidates before coming to its conclusion.

"The history of the editorial board would suggest that we would side squarely with the candidate with a more traditional approach to pushing the nation forward, within the realities of a constitutional framework and a multiparty country," the editorial read. "But the events of the past few years have shaken the confidence of even the most committed institutionalists. We are not veering away from the values we espouse, but we are rattled by the weakness of the institutions that we trusted to undergird those values."

___________
Elizabeth Warren
✔
@ewarren
So, I guess @AmyKlobuchar and I are now both undefeated in elections and undefeated in New York Times endorsements! https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/01/19/opinion/amy-klobuchar-elizabeth-warren-nytimes-endorsement.html


Opinion | Amy Klobuchar and Elizabeth Warren Are Democrats’ Top Choices for President
In 2020, both the radical and the realist models warrant serious consideration.

nytimes.com

9:57 PM - Jan 19, 2020
___________

The paper called Warren a "gifted storyteller" who has "emerged as a standard-bearer for the Democratic left." The editorial board called her path to the White House "challenging, but not hard to envision."

Warren reposted the article on Twitter, joking, "So I guess @AmyKlobuchar and I are now both undefeated in New York Times endorsements!"

Klobuchar was described as the "standard-bearer," but for the party’s center. The paper gushed that she is the very definition of "Midwestern charisma, grit and sticktoitiveness."

The paper pointed to her goals of slashing childhood poverty, achieve 100 percent net-zero emissions by 2050 and her push for a more robust public option in healthcare. He moderate approach to governing would make for a formidable deal maker in Washington, the editorial wrote.

Reports on how she treats her staff “gave us pause,” but she pledged to do better in the future, the paper wrote.

Ian Bremmer, the political scientist and president of the Eurasia Group, criticized the paper's decision to endorse two candidates with "completely different worldviews" in an "apparent effort to render the endorsement meaningless."

___________
ian bremmer
✔
@ianbremmer
NYT endorses two candidates with two completely different worldviews. Apparently in an effort to render the endorsement meaningless.

3:07 AM - Jan 20, 2020
___________

Perhaps as important as who the paper endorsed is who it did not.

Joe Biden, the former vice president who continues to lead in polls, but his agenda does not go far enough on issues like climate and health care, the board wrote. The editorial board also wrote that Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., appeared to have missed his moment. The paper pointed out that he would be 79 when he's sworn in and has recently suffered a heart attack. "His health is a serious concern," it wrote.

The paper said it is looking forward to watching South Bend, Ind., Mayor Pete Buttigieg develop as a politician and said it was impressed with his resume, but it also pointed out that he never won more than 11,000 votes. The paper said it hopes Andrew Yang, the entrepreneur, also continues to work in politics and recommended looking to New York to get started.

Michael Bloomberg, the billionaire former mayor who the editorial board endorsed twice, falls short of the editorial board’s aspirations for 2020. The editorial pointed to issues like barring his own media company from investigating him and his refusal to let women who signed nondisclosure settlements speak to the media. The paper said his campaign approach “reveals more about America’s broken system than his likelihood of fixing it.”
Back to top Go down
https://ootikof.forumotion.com
Temple
Regular Member
Temple


Posts : 7317
Join date : 2014-07-29

The New York Times "breaking "from convention" Empty
PostSubject: Re: The New York Times "breaking "from convention"   The New York Times "breaking "from convention" EmptyMon Jan 20, 2020 1:42 pm

The times didn't take a side-
Warren a hard progressive-
Klobuchar a straight line moderate -

that is why they chose the two.. 2 sides of a coin.
not picking one side over the other- good move.

_________________
The New York Times "breaking "from convention" QEb4Czf
Back to top Go down
Grackle

Grackle


Posts : 2495
Join date : 2017-09-09

The New York Times "breaking "from convention" Empty
PostSubject: Re: The New York Times "breaking "from convention"   The New York Times "breaking "from convention" EmptyMon Jan 20, 2020 3:11 pm

Temple wrote:
The times didn't take a side-
Warren a hard progressive-
Klobuchar a straight line moderate -

that is why they chose the two.. 2 sides of a coin.
not picking one side over the other- good move.

Republicans and democrats are two different political parties with entirely different policies and ideologies .. They're both democrats ...They're not "2 sides" of anything ..

It shows that the MSM is bias and just an arm of the democrats ..You're just ignorant to that obvious fact
Back to top Go down
Grackle

Grackle


Posts : 2495
Join date : 2017-09-09

The New York Times "breaking "from convention" Empty
PostSubject: Re: The New York Times "breaking "from convention"   The New York Times "breaking "from convention" EmptyMon Jan 20, 2020 6:35 pm

Temple wrote:
The times didn't take a side-
Warren a hard progressive-
Klobuchar a straight line moderate


Whatever happens or does not happen with Warren and Klobuchar "will not interfere with your daily life"
Back to top Go down
The Wise And Powerful
Admin
Admin
The Wise And Powerful


Posts : 111040
Join date : 2014-07-29
Age : 101
Location : A Mile High

The New York Times "breaking "from convention" Empty
PostSubject: Re: The New York Times "breaking "from convention"   The New York Times "breaking "from convention" EmptyTue Jan 21, 2020 5:28 am


_________________
Non-Partisan Facts: https://usafacts.org

The New York Times "breaking "from convention" 1Qk4U7p

.
Back to top Go down
https://ootikof.forumotion.com
The Wise And Powerful
Admin
Admin
The Wise And Powerful


Posts : 111040
Join date : 2014-07-29
Age : 101
Location : A Mile High

The New York Times "breaking "from convention" Empty
PostSubject: Re: The New York Times "breaking "from convention"   The New York Times "breaking "from convention" EmptyTue Jan 21, 2020 5:33 am


_________________
Non-Partisan Facts: https://usafacts.org

The New York Times "breaking "from convention" 1Qk4U7p

.
Back to top Go down
https://ootikof.forumotion.com
Temple
Regular Member
Temple


Posts : 7317
Join date : 2014-07-29

The New York Times "breaking "from convention" Empty
PostSubject: Re: The New York Times "breaking "from convention"   The New York Times "breaking "from convention" EmptyTue Jan 21, 2020 9:45 am

Grackle wrote:
They're both democrats ...They're not "2 sides" of anything ..

It shows that the MSM is bias and just an arm of the democrats ..You're just ignorant to that obvious fact[/b]

the Democrat party is split..
Hard left progressives
and
Moderates

yes, there are 2 sides.


_________________
The New York Times "breaking "from convention" QEb4Czf
Back to top Go down
Grackle

Grackle


Posts : 2495
Join date : 2017-09-09

The New York Times "breaking "from convention" Empty
PostSubject: Re: The New York Times "breaking "from convention"   The New York Times "breaking "from convention" EmptyTue Jan 21, 2020 3:24 pm

Quote :
yes, there are 2 sides.

Both on one side ...democrat
Back to top Go down
Sponsored content





The New York Times "breaking "from convention" Empty
PostSubject: Re: The New York Times "breaking "from convention"   The New York Times "breaking "from convention" Empty

Back to top Go down
 
The New York Times "breaking "from convention"
Back to top 
Page 1 of 1
 Similar topics
-
» BREAKING; The New York Times Has Obtained TRUMP'S Tax-Return Data Extending Over More Than Two Decades
» Over 1,000 New York Times journalists and staff walked off the job
» New York Times: Pelosi will not hold vote on impeachment
» New York Times Fired Editor Over Trump Edit ..
» The New York Times Has an Embarrassing Epiphany About 'Gun-free Zones'

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
OOTIKOF / KATZENJAMMER :: Casual Banter :: Politics, Religion, Legal Issues, and Breaking News-
Jump to: