Trump Rape Accuser Seeks DNA Sample From President

Regular Member Posts : 7317 Join date : 2014-07-29

2020/01/30 ·

NEW YORK (AP) — Lawyers for a woman who accuses President Donald Trump of raping her in the 1990s are asking for a DNA sample, seeking to determine whether his genetic material is on a dress she says she wore during the encounter.

Advice columnist E. Jean Carroll’s lawyers served notice to a Trump attorney Thursday for Trump to submit a sample on March 2 in Washington for “analysis and comparison against unidentified male DNA present on the dress.”

Specifically, Trump has been requested to provide a sample of his saliva. Carroll provided a statement explaining her action:
Her lawyer, Kaplan, said it was “standard operating procedure” in a sexual assault investigation to request a DNA sample from the accused.

The dress Carroll was wearing when Trump allegedly attacked her was never washed and hung in Carroll’s closet for years.

In connection with her defamation suit, Carroll had the dress tested. A lab report found four DNA samples on the dress, at least one of them male.

Carroll’s attorneys have now formally requested a sample of Trump’s DNA to determine whether it matches the sample on the dress.

Posts : 2495 Join date : 2017-09-09

The woman allegedly gets raped by Trump ..has Trump smegma, jizum, saliva, urine, feces, or who knows what on her dress, doesn't wash it, and sticks it in a closet for 20-30 years ...Now, just coincidentally, during his impeachment trial, takes it out for a Trump DNA test on it ..that's my understanding of it...nothin wrong with that scenario ..

I forget what it's called ..chain of possession? ..somethin' like that .. A record of any material evidence is supposed to be kept ..i.e. where/how it was collected, photographed, and handled from cop to cop etc.. and held in an evidence room at a police dept. ... not shoved in a closet at somebody's house where anyone can tamper with it

Was DNA even a thing back then? ..Why would the woman not wash her dress? ..Why would she keep it in a closet for 20-30 years? ...just wondering

Regular Member Posts : 7317 Join date : 2014-07-29

The moment the dressing-room door is closed, he lunges at me, pushes me against the wall, hitting my head quite badly, and puts his mouth against my lips. I am so shocked I shove him back and start laughing again.
He seizes both my arms and pushes me up against the wall a second time, and, as I become aware of how large he is, he holds me against the wall with his shoulder and jams his hand under my coat dress and pulls down my tights

I am astonished by what I’m about to write:
I keep laughing. The next moment, still wearing correct business attire, shirt, tie, suit jacket, overcoat, he opens the overcoat, unzips his pants, and, forcing his fingers around my private area, thrusts his penis halfway — or completely, I’m not certain — inside me.
It turns into a colossal struggle.
I am wearing a pair of sturdy black patent-leather four-inch Barneys high heels, which puts my height around six-one, and I try to stomp his foot.
I try to push him off with my one free hand — for some reason, I keep holding my purse with the other — and I finally get a knee up high enough to push him out and off and I turn, open the door, and run out of the dressing room.
The whole episode lasts no more than three minutes.

Posts : 2495 Join date : 2017-09-09

You must be traumatized after going thru that, Temple .. It's very brave of you to share that with us

Grackle wrote:: You must be traumatized after going thru that, Temple .. It's very brave of you to share that with us

Posts : 2495 Join date : 2017-09-09

ahhh ...I remember this lady ...I remember an interview with her a while back ...she's a complete LOON ... After that short interview even the left just RAN from that rhetoric ...never heard from her since ...lol @ Temple

"If the dress doesn't fit, you must acquit"...

Posts : 2495 Join date : 2017-09-09

The Wise And Powerful wrote:: "If the dress doesn't fit, you must acquit"...

If the dress has jiz, it was none of hiz biz

Regular Member Posts : 7317 Join date : 2014-07-29

9-8-2020

(((if trump is inocent then;
give his DNA and have it over with
proven inocent if not a match-
it's that easly done)))

Bill Barr’s DOJ says Trump was acting as president when he allegedly defamed woman who accused him of rape.

President Donald Trump is seeking to have tax-payer lawyers defend him in a case revolving over whether he lied about raping a woman.

“The U.S. Justice Department is seeking to take over the defense of President Donald Trump in a defamation suit brought by advice columnist E. Jean Carroll, who claims Trump raped her two decades ago,” Bloomberg News reported Tuesday.

Carroll is seeking to depose Trump in the case and have him provide a DNA sample to match against the dress she still has from the alleged attack.

“Because President Trump was acting within the scope of his office or employment at the time of the incident out of which the plaintiff’s claim arose, the United States will file a motion to substitute itself for President Trump in this action” Bill Barr’s Department of Justice said in the filing.

Regular Member Posts : 7317 Join date : 2014-07-29

9-8-2020

Justice Department Jumps In To Help Trump In Lawsuit Filed By Rape Accuser
The DOJ wants to substitute the U.S. government for Trump as the defendant in the suit brought by author E. Jean Carroll, who has accused the president of rape.

Attorney General William Barr is once again going to bat for President Donald Trump, taking the unusual step of seeking to substitute the U.S. government for Trump as the defendant in a defamation lawsuit brought against him by a woman who claimed he raped her in the 1990s.

In a motion filed in New York state court on Tuesday, the Justice Department — citing a 1988 law known as the Westfall Act — said Trump had been “acting within the scope” of his office as president when he called author E. Jean Carroll’s rape accusation a lie during a June 2019 interview with The Hill. “She’s not my type,” the president said at the time. His remarks prompted Carroll to sue him for defamation.

The Westfall Act gives employees of the federal government immunity from lawsuits arising from actions undertaken within the scope of their employment. The Justice Department argued in its filing that since Trump was acting in an official capacity when he made those remarks about Carroll, the U.S. government should take Trump’s place as the defendant in the defamation case.

If the Justice Department’s request is approved, it will be responsible for defending the case, and the U.S. government would have to cover any damages that may be awarded ― all, ultimately, on the taxpayers’ dime.

The libel case will also be immediately moved from state court to federal court, The New York Times reported, although Carroll can seek its return to state court.

The Justice Department has yet to comment publicly on the case and did not immediately respond to HuffPost’s request for comment.

Though the Westfall Act ― a provision of the Federal Tort Claims Act ― requires the Justice Department to provide legal representation to federal employees sued because of actions undertaken as part of their official duties, it has “rarely, if ever, been used to protect a president,” the Times reported.

Neal Katyal, a former acting solicitor general of the U.S., lambasted the DOJ’s move as “insane.”
Other legal experts have also raised questions about the legality of the department’s request.

Regular Member Posts : 7317 Join date : 2014-07-29

If Trump really wanted to clear his name
all he has to do is provide his DNA.
What does his refusal to do so say?

E Jean Carrol claims to have the dress
with his DNA on it from when he raped her.
If she is lying than all trump would have to do
is provide a sample of DNA to prove it,
yet he refuses.
(((Trump is a rapist.

Now the American Taxpayer has to pay for his defence?

Regular Member Posts : 7317 Join date : 2014-07-29

5-5-2022

Rape accuser's lawsuit against Trump could allow
for a sampling of his DNA.

Lawyers for writer E. Jean Carroll will be ramping up her lawsuit accusing Donald Trump of defaming her after she accused him of raping her in the 1990s, according to CNBC News.

An agreement between Carroll's and Trump's lawyers could possibly allow DNA samples of Trump to be analyzed against a stain on a piece of clothing from Carroll that allegedly contains DNA she says is from the day of the attack.

“We are pleased that the parties have committed that fact discovery will resume in this case and be completed by November 16, 2022,” Carroll’s lawyer Roberta Kaplan said in a statement.

Carroll has alleged that Trump raped her in the changing room of a luxury New York department store in the mid-1990s.

She is suing him for defamation, claiming that his denials of the alleged attack, in which he said,
"She's not my type," had damaged her reputation and career.

Trump denies all the allegations and has never been prosecuted over them.

A month before his election victory in November 2016, a ten-year-old tape came to light in which the former reality TV star and real estate tycoon bragged about assaulting women.

((if you are not guilty then offer your DNA to prove it, it is that simple. Then there is no problem))))

Regular Member Posts : 7317 Join date : 2014-07-29

8-20-2022

Trump sued for sexual battery under new 'survivors' law.

On Tuesday, The Daily Beast reported that columnist E. Jean Carroll is moving to sue former President Donald Trump under a new sexual violence survivor law, accusing him of sexual battery.

The lawsuit stems from an incident in the late 1990s, during which Carroll alleges that the future president raped her in a department store changing room — and is an escalation of the litigation she is already advancing against him.

"In an August letter to a New York federal judge that was just made public Tuesday, Carroll’s lawyer notified the court that severe legal action was on the horizon," reported Jose Pagliery.

"The issue was brought up in court filings related to Carroll’s current lawsuit against the former president. She sued Trump while he was still at the White House, claiming she was defamed when Trump said the journalist’s revelations in her memoir were lies, adding a piggish line about how 'she's not my type.'"

As the report noted, Carroll already has a defamation suit against Trump for attacking her character with the claim she lied about the incident. However, this would be the first time Carroll actually sued the former president over the alleged rape itself.

"Roberta A. Kaplan, the journalist’s lawyer, explained in her letter to the judge that Carroll is now preparing to file a separate lawsuit under New York’s Adult Survivors Act 'on the earliest possible date,' which is Nov. 24," said the report.
"Kaplan also explained that Trump—as he has done in nearly every court case of late—is refusing to turn over court-mandated evidence [his sperm sample]
Trump 'remains unwilling to produce any documents in discovery,' not 'a single document,' Kaplan wrote. That's why, she said, Trump should be dragged into a room for a deposition that will question him under oath — an embarrassing exercise that could elicit damning information from the former president. And given that it's a civil case, any question Trump refuses to answer can be interpreted in the worst light possible — even as an admission."

This comes as Trump, who has been accused of sexual harassment and assault by more than two dozen women.

Posts : 2495 Join date : 2017-09-09

We Believe Survivors!!

Haa .. We saw and heard the blather from this lady years ago ..claims she has DNA on a dress from like 20 years ago or some shit.. So she never washed the dress for all those years.. Trump becomes president and she decides it's time to accuse him of rape .. He claims she's lying and she sues him for defamation for denying the accusation ... The lady is a loon.. No doubt lawyers are egging her on, hoping to get in the news and be relevant

... And Jussy Smollett was attacked by 2 white men wearing red hats, yelling "~Dis MAGA COUNTRY!~" in Chicago in the wee hours.. He even had a nick on his cheek

Regular Member Posts : 7317 Join date : 2014-07-29

The DNA has been tested and is viable--
It waits for trumps sample--
To show if a match or not--
trump will not give his sample--
If trump had given his sample to prove his innocence.
then it would have been over if he were not a match.--
He refuses to give his sample, so soon he will be ordered to give it.

Posts : 2495 Join date : 2017-09-09

You were carrying on about this same shit years ago, Temple .. You let your obsessive hate for Trump distort whatever common sense you might have once had ..
... They don't need Trump to jerk off in a vial for his DNA .. They can get it anywhere from anything.. Shit, get it from the FBI .. They just raided his fucking home.. Must be some DNA on some shit they took .. They can get it from the rim on a glass...sweat from his hands on a podium .. They don't need a warrant to collect DNA from anywhere in public.. So all these years he's been too cautious and clever to leave any DNA anywhere?

You can believe whatever far fetched crap you want .. I don't care ... You're not gonna convince me he forcibly raped some looney in the dressing room of a department store, got a stain on her dress that she saved for like 20 years until she decided to charge him after he became president .. ~c'mon man~ ...lol

But let us know when they force him to comply and his rape trial begins, ok?.. Thanx

Regular Member Posts : 7317 Join date : 2014-07-29

9-25-2022

Trump rape accuser E. Jean Carroll plans new lawsuit against former president.

NEW YORK, Sept 20 (Reuters) -
A writer who accused Donald Trump of raping her more than a quarter-century ago plans to file a new lawsuit against the former U.S. president, whose lawyer called the effort "extraordinarily prejudicial."

In a letter made public on Tuesday, a lawyer for E. Jean Carroll said the former Elle magazine columnist plans to sue Trump for battery and intentional infliction of emotional distress under New York state's Adult Survivors Act.

That law, recently signed by New York Governor Kathy Hochul, gives adult accusers a one-year window to bring civil claims over alleged sexual misconduct regardless of how long ago it occurred.

Carroll has accused Trump of raping her in late 1995 or early 1996 in a dressing room at the Bergdorf Goodman department store in Midtown Manhattan.

Carroll's lawyer Roberta Kaplan said her client plans to sue Trump on Nov. 24 when the state law takes effect, and that the claims and Carroll's existing defamation case against Trump could be tried together in February 2023.

In a letter responding to Kaplan, Trump's lawyer Alina Habba said Trump "adamantly" objected to combining both cases, after both sides finished gathering evidence for trial, and that it was "extraordinarily prejudicial" to add the new claims.

"To permit plaintiff to drastically alter the scope and subject matter of this case at such time would severely prejudice defendant's rights," Habba wrote. "Plaintiff's request must be disregarded in its entirety."

Kaplan also said she now wants Trump to testify under oath at a deposition, to better understand his "theory of the case," despite her saying in February that a deposition wouldn't be needed.

"To be clear, the deposition of defendant need not take very long," Kaplan said.

Kaplan's letter is dated Aug. 8 and Habba's is dated Aug. 11. They were made public on Tuesday afternoon. U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan oversees the case.

Trump faces an array of litigation and investigations, including into his efforts to undo the 2020 U.S. presidential election and refusal to turn over various documents.

Trump has argued that he was shielded from the lawsuit by a federal law that provides immunity to government employees from defamation claims.

** Carroll's lawyers have said they want to obtain a DNA sample from Trump to compare against a dress Carroll claimed to have worn during the alleged rape. **

The case is Carroll v Trump, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 20-07311.

Regular Member Posts : 5789 Join date : 2017-05-22

Temple wrote:: The DNA has been tested and is viable--
It waits for trumps sample--
To show if a match or not--
trump will not give his sample--
If trump had given his sample to prove his innocence.
then it would have been over if he were not a match.--
He refuses to give his sample, so soon he will be ordered to give it.

What if the DNA turns out to be Bill Clintons?

Posts : 2495 Join date : 2017-09-09

directorate wrote:: What if the DNA turns out to be Bill Clintons?

He did not have sex with that woman!

Temple is a Trump gossip hound.. Everything and anything involving Trump he reports on it here ..

I remember the same rape accusation from this same lady several years ago with the same hold up of not having Trump's DNA .. It's just more piling on of charges against him because they're terrified that he could get back in the white house .. He would throw a stick in the spokes of democrats.. He would end them

Trump Wins Ruling In Rape Accuser Carroll’s Defamation Lawsuit
BY TYLER DURDEN
THURSDAY, SEP 29, 2022 - 03:40 PM
Authored by Rita Li via The Epoch Times

A federal appeals court in Manhattan handed former President Donald Trump a procedural victory Tuesday in a defamation lawsuit, after famed columnist E. Jean Carroll claimed that Trump had raped her in the 1990s.

In a two-to-one decision on Sept. 27, the panel on the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that a lower court erred when it ruled that Carroll could sue Trump for defamatory statements during his presidency, given that a federal law, known as the Westfall Act, shields government employees from liability in work-related incidents.

Carroll, 78, sued Trump in 2019, claiming the Republican sexually assaulted her in the mid-1990s in a dressing room at a Bergdorf Goodman department store in Manhattan. Because the alleged attack happened decades ago, Carroll was originally barred from suing over sexual battery, pushing her to sue for defamation over allegedly disparaging comments Trump made about the rape allegation.

Trump denied her allegation at the time and accused her of using false claims as a way to promote her book. “I’ll say it with great respect: Number one, she’s not my type. Number two, it never happened,” the-then president told The Hill in an interview at the White House in June 2019.

The D.C. Court of Appeals is now asked to weigh in on whether Trump was acting within the scope of his presidential duties when he denied raping Carroll and dismissed her during the interview. If Trump was, he would be entitled to immunity from the lawsuit, according to the ruling by the 2nd Circuit judges. And while the U.S. government can be sued over some wrongdoing by its employees, it is immune from defamation lawsuits, which would mean Carroll’s suit would fail.

In a majority opinion written by Circuit Judge Guido Calabresi on Tuesday, two members of the 2nd Circuit’s three-judge panel declined to further address the defamation action while the matter was “of extreme public importance.”

“We do not pass judgment or express any view as to whether Trump’s public statements were indeed defamatory or whether the sexual assault allegations had, in fact, occurred,” the judges said.

Trump’s lawyer Alina Habba, meanwhile, welcomed the decision, saying it “will protect the ability of all future presidents to effectively govern without hindrance.”

“We are confident that the D.C. Court of Appeals will find that our client was acting within the scope of his employment when properly repudiating Ms. Carroll’s allegations,” she said in a statement.

Former Attorney General William Barr and current Attorney General Merrick Garland defended the Department of Justice’s decision to back Trump as a defendant in the ongoing defamation case.

Dissent
In an opinion written by Judge Denny Chin, the third judge who dissented, he said that the law protecting federal employees from liability does not apply to Trump. He said it was only to protect low-level, rank-and-file government employees rather than the president.

And he said at least some of the former president’s statements were not part of his official duties.

“Trump was not acting in the scope of his employment when he made comments about Carroll and her accusations because he was not serving any purpose of the federal government,” wrote the judge, who was appointed by former President Barack Obama.

“In the context of an accusation of rape, the comment ‘she’s not my type’ surely is not something one would expect the President of the United States to say in the course of his duties. Carroll’s allegations plausibly paint a picture of a man pursuing a personal vendetta against an accuser, not the United States’ ‘chief constitutional officer’ engaging in ‘supervisory and policy responsibilities of utmost discretion and sensitivity,’” Chin added.

Regular Member Posts : 7317 Join date : 2014-07-29

9-28-2022

Appeals court declines to give Trump immunity
in lawsuit from rape accuser.

A federal appeals court on Tuesday declined to rule that former President Donald Trump is immune from a defamation lawsuit brought by E. Jean Carroll related to rape allegations.

Reuters reported that the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan issued a 2-1 decision asking a higher District of Columbia appeals court to examine the case.

Carroll, a former columnist, sued Trump in 2019 after he told a reporter, "she's not my type," in response to rape allegations.

"As relevant here, the question touches upon the duties of the President of the United States, and the personal tort liability he and his successors may (or may not) face under the Westfall Act.

Getting the law of the local jurisdiction right is, therefore, of crucial importance, and only the highest local court is capable of making such a determination," the 57-page ruling explained.

According to Reuters, the appeals court "also handed Trump a victory in declaring he was a U.S. government 'employee' when he allegedly defamed Carroll, a condition underlying his immunity claim."

Roberta Kaplan, an attorney for Carroll, was "confident" that the Washington appeals court would let the case go forward.

Posts : 2495 Join date : 2017-09-09

Frivolous bullshit
Democrats have a fucking committee organized and made a prime time TV show outta their relentless efforts to *get Trump* .. Why would this stupid defamation crap be of any importance to anyone?
... Trump saying "she's not my type" was probably just a polite way of saying she's an ugly, dumb bitch
... The defamation charge is a waste of the court's time and taxpayer's money

Regular Member Posts : 7317 Join date : 2014-07-29

Grackle wrote:: Frivolous bullshit

trump can make it all go away; end it--
he just needs to give a sperm sample to prove
he is innocent and then it's over..
But- he's fighting to the death not to give it.

Posts : 2495 Join date : 2017-09-09

Temple wrote:

Grackle wrote:: Frivolous bullshit

trump can make it all go away; end it--
he just needs to give a sperm sample to prove
he is innocent and then it's over..
But- he's fighting to the death not to give it.

*sigh* ... We've been over this, Rerun .. Years ago and again on this thread

For one thing, i highly doubt that any court would persue a rape accusation from over 25 years ago... But then, it's against Trump, so who knows
...
Another thing... There's something called "chain of custody" .. If a DNA sample was taken from the woman's dress after the alleged rape 25 years ago and sat in a police evidence locker since then, it might be viable evidence .. But being that the alleged evidence supposedly sat in the woman's *closet* for 20 years or so until the woman decided to persue a rape charge, it's worthless, because nobody knows where the alleged evidence has been and/or how it was gathered

It seems "suspicious" that the woman didn't persue her accusation for 20 years, and only decided to make the accusation after her alleged attacker/Trump became president .. You can't believe I'm the only one that questions her motive(s) ..

Also (again) .. There's no need for Trump to jack off in a jar to gather his DNA .. They can get it from a glass, bottle (anything he drank from)...his clothes..a hat..anywhere he might have sweat .. stains in his fuk'n draws

DNA has come a long way since OJ Simpson .. The FBI just raided his home.. surely there's plenty of DNA just in the alleged evidence they collected .. Maybe an agent grabbed a pair of his wife's draws while rifling through her closet for nuclear weapons documents ...be a good place to check

Regular Member Posts : 5789 Join date : 2017-05-22

It would be easy to get a stool sample from Temple due to him being full of shit.

» Scientist Explains How Trump `Obliterated’ Obama’s Pandemic Response Infrastructure
» U.S. House committee seeks Trump tax returns from IRS
» U.S. government seeks to dismiss suit against Trump, Washington Post says
» Trump 1st President To---
» Dear President Trump