Temple
Regular Member
Posts : 7317
Join date : 2014-07-29
 | | Subject: Chicago Tribune Editorial: Jackhammer The Trump Sign On Trump Tower. Thu Dec 08, 2022 5:41 pm | |
| 12-8-2022
Chicago Tribune Editorial:
Time to take a jackhammer to the Trump sign
on Chicago’s Trump Tower.
Back in 2014, Donald Trump wrote an op-ed for this newspaper titled “Why I love Chicago and My Sign.”
Trump was fighting back against Chicagoans who objected to five massive letters affixed to Trump’s International Hotel and Tower, viewing them as an affront to the city’s architectural glory.
The letters, T-R-U-M-P, ruined the view of the city, especially
when looking north up Wabash Avenue.
The newspaper’s then-architecture critic, Blair Kamin, waged an intense fight against this visual pollution on our pages.
But anyone who has blinked at downtown
of late knows who won.
Trump.
“A deal’s a deal,” he wrote. The sign is still there.
Time’s up, Trump. But, first, some history.
That deal was boosted by a $50,000 contribution to then-Mayor Rahm Emanuel’s mayoral campaign and $5,000 to Ald.
Brendan Reilly’s, in whose ward the tower resides. And let’s not forget that Trump hired the property tax law firm of now-indicted Ald.
Edward Burke, 14th, who helped him reduce his property tax bill by over $12 million during a six-year stretch, an investigation by the Chicago Sun-Times found.
Assuming Trump signed something close to the usual appeal deal, that would have meant millions accrued to Burke, now accused of corruption by the federal government.
In 2021, Ald. Gilbert Villegas, 36th, sponsored an ordinance that would ban “any person convicted of treason, sedition or subversive actions from doing business with the city, including having a sign permit.”
That was a broadside against the sign, which Villegas said did not conform with “Chicago’s values.”
This editorial board did not support Villegas’ ordinance. “Chicago values?” we wrote.
“Are freedom of expression and private property rights also Chicago values? It’s Trump’s building, and he should have the prerogative of stamping his name on it.
The city once conceded as much.”
That was true. And we didn’t stop there:
“Aldermen and Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot obviously are tempted to get swept into anti-Trump fever and chest-thumping about taking down a sign.
But they also would be reneging on an agreement; they would be inviting a lawsuit that the city could lose and would be costly to defend; and they would be trampling on private property rights. They would be wise to swallow their distaste and leave the sign alone.”
But two things happened this week.
The first was that Trump himself called for “the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution,” in support of his baseless claims of massive fraud in the 2020 election. Just Trumpian blather, the man’s defenders said. Nothing to do with the Trump Organization or the sign.
But here’s the second, and more significant, issue.
Two Trump Organization companies, Trump Corp. and Trump Payroll Corp,
were convicted Tuesday of 17 counts of criminal tax fraud, falsifying records and other crimes in New York State Supreme Court in Manhattan.
The jury found that the Trump Organization was corrupt at the core, we are less than shocked to learn, helping executives dodge required taxes on a punch bowl of perks from luxury apartments to Mercedes-Benzes to cold, hard, cash.
Let’s review. In a matter of days, if not hours, Trump failed to do his duty to support the Constitution, an act that should preclude a further run for president, and the Trump Organization was exposed as a criminal enterprise.
And Chicagoans still have to look at that sign?
Granted, the city will need to take advice from its lawyers and we acknowledge the conviction likely
did not nix all property rights.
But this is worth a new negotiation.
Reintroduce an ordinance. Evoke moral turpitude.
Try to get it taken down. This time with our support and,
we’ll wager, most everyone who lives there.
 Chicago Tribune
|
|
