Brett Kavanaugh' Another Allegation of Sexual Misconduct Emerges

New York Times updates Kavanaugh 'bombshell' to note accuser doesn't recall alleged assault

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/nyt-kavanaugh-bombshell-goes-bust-after-2020-dems-use-it-to-call-for-impeachment

directorate wrote:

New York Times updates Kavanaugh 'bombshell' to note accuser doesn't recall alleged assault

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/nyt-kavanaugh-bombshell-goes-bust-after-2020-dems-use-it-to-call-for-impeachment

BWAHAA FOX-- that's state tv,,
anyways that is why an investigation is needed.
those women don't want to get involved..
I don't blame them- ''I didn't see nutin, nope''
deaths threats, need to move, no privacy, life turned upsidedown, yah know how it goes.

still, there is 25 witness that the FBI wasn't allowed to interview/whatever that needs to be done.

Soros Fuels Dark Money Judicial Group That Fights Kavanaugh, Trump Nominations
Demand Justice took in $2.6M from Soros nonprofit in 2018
Joe Schoffstall - SEPTEMBER 9, 2019 5:00 AM

A "dark money" group that was established to push back against the judicial nominations of President Donald Trump, and which was at the forefront of the battle against Justice Brett Kavanaugh and continues to go after him to this day, was heavily financed by liberal billionaire George Soros around the time of its inception, grants show.

Demand Justice, a left-wing advocacy group, was established in 2018 and is led by Brian Fallon, the former press secretary for Hillary Clinton's failed 2016 campaign. The group does not disclose its donors and is a project of the Sixteen Thirty Fund, which falls under the umbrella of Arabella Advisors—an intricate dark money network containing dozens of liberal groups and projects. The network is used as a "pass through" entity for Democratic donors and has facilitated $1.6 billion in funds to liberal entities in recent years.

Due to Demand Justice's arrangement with the Sixteen Thirty Fund, which acts as its fiscal sponsor, it does not have to file annual tax forms to the Internal Revenue Service. Those who contribute to groups housed at the Sixteen Thirty Fund can also mark the money to the fund's name, where it is passed to the intended groups while ultimately masking the destination.

However, the Open Society Policy Center, Soros's 501(c)(4) D.C.-based advocacy group, outright marked that it had sent $2.5 million to Demand Justice for general support between April 1 and June 30, 2018, according to a review of its grants. Soros's group sent $87,000 more to Fallon's group between Oct. 1 and Dec. 31 to "support advocacy on judicial nominations."

The initial grant from Soros's policy center, which is an affiliated entity to the Open Society Foundations, was given to Fallon's group around the time that the former Clinton henchman appeared at a secretive gathering of the Democracy Alliance, the left's largest donor club that was co-founded by Soros, in Atlanta. The Washington Free Beacon was present at the gathering and spotted Fallon at the bar. The Free Beacon also obtained documents showing that Fallon was there on behalf of Demand Justice, which was not publicly launched at the time.

Soros's policy center sent $1.3 million more to the Sixteen Thirty Fund during the second quarter of 2017. Those funds are not marked toward any particular group, but instead are reported as supporting advocacy on executive nominations, policy advocacy on social safety net programs, and cross-sector policy advocacy and planning.

Soros's Open Society Policy Center also made numerous grants for nearly $2 million to other left-wing groups for advocacy on judicial nominations last year. Those included two grants for $1,000,000 total to Planned Parenthood Action Fund, $350,000 to Color of Change (which also went toward voting rights), $150,000 to the Center for American Progress Action Fund, and $150,000 to the Committee for a Fair Judiciary, among others.

"We are proud to support Demand Justice, which is doing critical work to ensure the integrity of our courts, and which we disclose at the OSPC website," said Jonathan Kaplan, spokesperson for the Open Society Policy Center.

In May 2018, shortly after Demand Justice's public launch, it undertook a campaign against federal district nominee Thomas Farr. On July 9, 2018, Trump nominated Brett Kavanaugh to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Demand Justice vowed to spend millions fighting Kavanaugh's nomination and dropped hundreds of thousands of dollars into advertisements on Dr. Christine Blasey Ford's testimony in Washington, D.C., and other cable and broadcast networks in Alaska and Maine.

In April, Demand Justice and a coalition of more than two dozen liberal groups petitioned Democrats in the House of Representatives to request Kavanaugh records that were held during the confirmation process. House Judiciary chairman Jerry Nadler (N.Y.) responded by requesting Kavanaugh's records from his time in the White House from 2001 to 2006.

"These documents could prove that Kavanaugh lied under oath to the Senate," Fallon said in early August. "They may also shed light on his true views on issues like Roe v. Wade, and reveal biases that should disqualify him from hearing abortion-related cases in the future."

Like Fallon, Nadler has links to the Democracy Alliance. Earlier this year, Nadler gave a private briefing to the deep-pocketed liberal donors at their spring gathering in Austin, the Free Beacon discovered at the meeting.

Demand Justice and others are planning protests against Kavanaugh on Oct. 6, the one-year anniversary of his confirmation. The activists have called the fight against Kavanaugh "unfinished business."

Senate Democrats also rely on groups like Demand Justice for judicial nomination fights.

In early July, Sen. Chuck Schumer (D., N.Y.) and a number of Democratic senators released a letter demanding that the conservative Judicial Crisis Network make public the names of donors who have given the group more than $10,000 since 2017, despite relying on such groups themselves. The letter was sent after the Judicial Crisis Network launched a $1.1 million campaign calling on 2020 Democratic presidential contenders to release their supposed "secret list" of judges.

The Alliance for Justice, a liberal judicial activist group that also does not disclose its donors, said in June that it was launching the "building the bench" initiative that would create a list of judges that the next Democratic president could use to nominate individuals to federal courts.

Demand Justice did not respond to a request for comment.

Give it up Temple. Beating a dead horse is animal cruelty.

Temple wrote:

The debate is over whether the most recent Supreme Court justice perjured himself during his Senate hearing last year — which would be an impeachable offense.

Why did they wait a year to "debate" his (alleged) perjury and add another bogus, decades old (alleged) victim?

Quote :

The bottom-line takeaway is that Kavanaugh lied under oath during his confirmation hearings.

What lie? ..He said he didn't do what was alleged and didn't remember Ford ...How do you prove you didn't do somethin'?

Quote :

Republicans covered for him by limiting the testimony against him to Christine Blasey Ford,
They refused to hear testimony from any other witnesses who might have been able to corroborate her account, or discuss Kavanaugh’s behavior at the time.

Bullshit ..There were no witnesses to the alleged incident and nobody to corroborate her story ...She couldn't even remember where it was ...Why don't they bring these corroborating witnesses forward now ..or why haven't they brought them forward for the past year?

Quote :

The entire process was set up by Senate Republicans to make it seem that there was no corroborating evidence for Ford’s claims when there clearly was.

"Clearly was"? ...Oh but the democrats didn't bring the "corroborating evidence" forward for some reason ...Tricky, them republicans huh ...Guess they "made it seem" like the FBI couldn't find evidence to corroborate her story ...and don't be absurd and try to claim the FBI was ever pro republican

Quote :

Should the fact that a very drunk guy did this — should this be disqualifying?


Yes! lying about it a crime.
Kavanaugh lied under oath on many accounts of his drunken party time.

Again, he says he didn't do it and doesn't remember the bitch ...Dems couldn't prove otherwise a year ago and still can't now ...It's idiotic for them to try to rehash the circus shitshow they put on, and even more idiotic to try to use another bogus allegation to revisit it and hope for a do-over

Surely this wouldn't have anything to do with Ginsburg dying right? ...That'd be another justice that trump could nominate ...Then their only hope would be to win the presidential election and try to "reconstruct" the SCOTUS and add more judges ...fukkers wanna control everything

Grackle wrote:

Should be a short vid from cbs right at the top ...not sure how shit works with twitter

https://twitter.com/CBSEveningNews/status/1173729651199549446

BK will be divorced within 2 years. The wife from TX will run off with a Negrow.

I can read it in their eyes.

Grackle wrote:

Lemon wrote:

BK will be divorced within 2 years.  The wife from TX will run off with a Negrow.  

I can read it in their eyes.

ugh ..Another seer

....The doll in your avatar is creepy too ..ha

Take me seeriously.