Donald Trump arrives for civil fraud trial opening in NYC

Jeb Bush comes to Trump’s defense after $355M fraud judgment: 'Damage could cascade'
Emma Colton
Mon, February 26, 2024 at 8:53 AM MST

Jeb Bush comes to Trump’s defense after $355M fraud judgment: 'Damage could cascade' came to the defense of former President Trump in a Wall Street Journal op-ed slamming the recent New York civil fraud court case that ordered the 45th president to pay a $354.8 million fine plus interest.

"Every American has a right to be critical of Mr. Trump’s politics—one of us ran against him in 2016," reads Bush’s op-ed, titled, "Elon Musk and Donald Trump Cases Imperil the Rule of Law."

"…But equality before the law is precious, and these rulings represent a crisis not only for the soundness of our courts, but for the business environment that has allowed the U.S. to prosper," the opinion piece continued. "If these rulings stand, the damage could cascade through the economy, creating fear of arbitrary enforcement against entrepreneurs who seek public office or raise their voices as citizens in a way that politicians dislike."

The column, which was co-authored by Palantir co-founder Joe Lonsdale, railed against the recent monthslong civil fraud trial against Trump, which resulted in a nearly $355 million fine and bars Trump from operating his business in New York for three years. The opinion piece also spoke out against how a Delaware judge recently rescinded tech billionaire Elon Musk's $56 billion compensation from Tesla.

“Stunning”: Expert says gag order filing shows DA treating Trump trial like “organized crime case”
Gabriella Ferrigine, Salon
Tue, February 27, 2024 at 8:35 AM MST

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg is already seeking a partial gag order to ensure that former President Donald Trump and his legal team are unable to publicly attack or threaten witnesses, jurors, staffers, and others who may be involved in the former president's upcoming criminal hush money trial.

Bragg's office, in a series of motions filed Monday to New York Supreme Court Justice Juan Merchan, wrote that Trump “has a long history of making public and inflammatory remarks about the participants in various judicial proceedings against him, including jurors, witnesses, lawyers, and court staff."

The motion cited the hundreds of concerning messages his office received after he first indicted the ex-president for allegedly falsifying business records related to a hush money payment made to adult film star Stormy Daniels last March. Bragg's office also noted that Trump's propensity for public remarks about perceived political or legal adversaries “pose a significant and imminent threat to the orderly administration of this criminal proceeding and a substantial likelihood of causing material prejudice."

Prosecutors in the motion also requested that Merchan withhold jury information from Trump if he intimidates the jury selection process, which is slated to begin on March 25, given that his past behavior “presents a significant risk of juror harassment and intimidation that warrants reasonable protective measures.”

The district attorney's team also underscored Trump's comments about the jury foreperson in the 2019 trial of his campaign adviser, Roger Stone, as well as Trump's fraudulent accusations against two Georgia poll workers — Shaye Moss and Ruby Freeman — in 2020. Moss and Freeman faced an inundation of racist and threatening phone calls, and Freeman eventually had to move once her address was circulated online.

Prosecutors in the motion argued that keeping the names and addresses of jurors private would “ensure the integrity of these proceedings, minimize obstacles to jury selection, and protect juror safety.” As noted by The Washington Post, the requested gag order would not shield Bragg from Trump's inevitable vitriol.

"One of the most stunning aspects of the protective order the Manhattan DA seeks in his prosecution of Donald Trump," tweeted former U.S. Attorney Joyce Vance, "is that although Trump is entitled to know the identities of jurors, the DA has asked to keep their addresses secret. Like you would in an organized crime case."

Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.

Trump spokesperson Steven Cheung on Monday responded to news of the gag order request by calling it a form of election interference, according to WaPo. Cheung said it “would impose an unconstitutional infringement” on the ex-president, “including his ability to defend himself, and the rights of all Americans to hear from President Trump.”

Trump has faced gag orders in several other legal cases, including a limited gag order imposed by U.S. District Court Judge Tanya Chutkan in his D.C. election subversion trial as well as a partial gag order in his New York civil fraud trial.